Skip to content
logo The magazine for digital lifestyle and entertainment
Apple CoBi News Video games All topics
App Store Rules

Apple vs. Epic Games: Dispute Over Fees Escalates Again

Laptop with Epic Logo and Apple Smartphone
Apple and Epic Games face off in court again over App Store fees Photo: Getty Images
Share article

April 14, 2026, 3:47 pm | Read time: 3 minutes

The dispute between Apple and Epic Games continues. The iPhone maker plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court again. The goal is to challenge a decision that limits Apple’s ability to charge commissions for purchases made outside of apps.

The conflict has been ongoing for several years. Apple remains determined to defend its existing rules. The central issue is whether and to what extent the company can charge fees for external payment methods.

How the Conflict Originally Began

The dispute was triggered by a decision from Epic Games in 2020. The company integrated its own payment processing into its apps to bypass the fees incurred in Apple’s App Store.

The court did not find a monopoly at the time. Apple won most of the case. However, the company was required to allow external purchase options. Apple challenged this in 2021, but the Supreme Court declined to review it, leaving the ruling in place.

As a result, Apple allowed external payments but continued to charge a 27 percent commission, just below the usual 30 percent for in-app purchases. Epic Games sees this as a violation of the court’s directives.

Court Sees Violation by Apple

In 2025, a U.S. district court ruled in favor of Epic Games. The judges found that Apple had violated the court’s directives but did not specify an alternative fee rate. This decision put pressure on Apple, yet the company remains steadfast and seeks another court review.

More on the topic

Apple Seeks New Review

According to TechCrunch, Apple wants to bring the case before the Supreme Court again. The company aims to have the judges examine another aspect of the case.

Apple has long argued that the fees are not charged for payment processing itself. Instead, they are meant to cover services such as hosting, data analysis, developer tools, and software. If the court accepts the case, it could have far-reaching implications for App Store rules.

Epic Games Criticizes Apple’s Actions

Alongside the new initiative, Apple requested a temporary suspension of the existing restrictions. On April 6, 2026, the court granted this request. Epic Games immediately responded by filing an appeal.

A spokesperson for Epic Games sharply criticized Apple’s actions. She said it was
“another delay tactic designed to prevent the court from effectively and permanently restricting Apple’s ability to charge excessive fees for third-party payments.”

Also interesting: Leak reveals storage sizes and price of iPhone Fold

She further stated: “Courts have repeatedly declared this illegal. Epic has heard directly from many developers in our efforts to offer webshops and similar features as competition to Apple. Due to Apple’s tactics, only a few brave developers, including Spotify, Kindle, and Patreon, have been willing to use this right and benefit consumers. We will continue to resist Apple’s attempts to undermine competition.”

This article is a machine translation of the original German version of TECHBOOK and has been reviewed for accuracy and quality by a native speaker. For feedback, please contact us at info@techbook.de.

You have successfully withdrawn your consent to the processing of personal data through tracking and advertising when using this website. You can now consent to data processing again or object to legitimate interests.