July 10, 2026, 12:33 pm | Read time: 4 minutes
Signing up for a streaming subscription does not automatically mean losing your right to cancel with the first stream. This was decided by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). According to the ruling, streaming services can be considered digital services under certain conditions. For consumers, this means that starting to stream does not automatically result in the loss of the right to cancel.
The case involved a contract clause from Sky Austria (Case C‑234/25). Customers were supposed to agree that streaming would start immediately upon signing the contract, thereby losing their right to cancel. However, the European Court of Justice does not consider this permissible in every case. The key factor is whether a provider merely offers digital content or a continuously evolving streaming service with additional features.
How the Case Came About
The case was triggered by a lawsuit from the Austrian Consumer Information Association (VKI) against Sky Austria. The company offers its streaming subscriptions online. Before signing the contract, customers had to agree to a clause stating that streaming would start immediately. At the same time, they confirmed that they would lose their right to cancel.
The VKI considered this regulation inadmissible. In their view, the streaming offer is not about providing digital content but a digital service. In this case, the right to cancel does not expire with the start of streaming.
In the first instance, Sky Austria initially won. However, the appellate court decided in 2024 in favor of the consumer protection association and classified the streaming offer as a digital service. Sky Austria then appealed to the Supreme Court in Austria.
Since the interpretation of the EU Consumer Rights Directive was crucial, the Supreme Court referred the question to the ECJ. The judges in Luxembourg were to clarify whether a streaming subscription is legally classified as digital content or a digital service. This classification determines when consumers lose their right to cancel.
Netflix Under Pressure: Court Overturns Price Increases in Italy
What Ever Happened to Kim Dotcom?
What Matters According to the ECJ
With Sky Austria’s streaming service, users can watch content live or on demand. Some programs can also be downloaded and viewed offline for a limited time. Additionally, the offering is continuously updated and supplemented with personal recommendations that can be based on user behavior.
According to the ECJ, customers receive not just individual movies or series. They use a service that evolves during the contract period and offers additional features. This dynamic nature is precisely what distinguishes a digital service from merely providing digital content.
The court believes this is also why consumers should be better protected here. Those who sign up for a streaming subscription online cannot fully assess its content, features, and usage options before signing the contract. The right to cancel is therefore intended to allow testing the service within the legal period.
Editor on Streaming: “Why I Consider Netflix and Co. to Be Regressive”
What the Ruling Means for Consumers
The ruling does not mean that every streaming subscription can be canceled at any time. Whether a provider is classified as a digital service depends on the characteristics of the specific offer.
If a consumer cancels the contract within the legal period, the provider can demand payment for the service already used. This compensation must be reasonable and based on the value of the service already provided.
With its ruling, the ECJ has established criteria for evaluating streaming offers in the future. Based on these guidelines, the Supreme Court in Austria must now decide the legal dispute between Sky Austria and the Consumer Information Association.